careers

Best AI for Resumes

Compare the best AI resume tools as of July 2026 — Teal, Rezi, Kickresume, Enhancv, Jobscan, Zety and general assistants like ChatGPT and Claude — with current pricing, ATS pass rates, real features and decisive picks for building, tailoring and optimising a resume that gets read.

Updated July 2026

Quick answer: There is no single best AI for resumes — the right tool depends on whether you need to write, build or optimise. For most job seekers, the best all-round choice is Teal, whose free plan combines an AI resume builder, per-job tailoring and an application tracker in one place. For beating applicant tracking systems specifically, Rezi is strongest, built ATS-first around a 23-point scoring system, with Jobscan the best standalone scanner for measuring your match rate against a specific job. For polished design, Kickresume and Enhancv lead. For writing help, a general assistant like ChatGPT or Claude drafts strong bullet points for free — but on its own a chatbot resume passes ATS filters far less often than a dedicated tool (roughly 29% versus 71% in one 2026 head-to-head, CareerBldr). The caveat that frames everything: in 2026 your resume is read first by AI that ranks it, not a human, so tailoring to the specific job matters more than a fancy template — and a generic AI-written resume now works against you, with 67% of HR leaders saying AI-generated applications have slowed their hiring process (Robert Half, Forbes).

The honest answer depends on where you are in your search and what is broken. This guide covers the full stack — dedicated AI resume builders, ATS optimisers, general assistants, design tools and LinkedIn’s own features — with current pricing, real capabilities and decisive picks. Two shifts define 2026: the resume is now screened by an AI ranking layer on top of the old keyword filter, and because nearly everyone applies with AI, an undifferentiated AI resume has become a liability rather than an edge. Read the ATS and “will AI hurt your chances” sections before you pick a tool.

The current state of AI for resumes: July 2026

Writing a resume with AI is no longer the advantage it was in 2023 — because the people reading it are using AI too, and almost every applicant is doing the same thing. Five shifts define where things stand.

1. AI reads your resume before any human does — but the “75% auto-rejected” stat is a myth. Applicant tracking systems are now near-universal: 98.8% of Fortune 500 companies run one, and 79% of organisations have integrated AI or automation directly into their ATS (SelectSoftwareReviews). The widely repeated claim that ~75% of resumes are auto-rejected before a human sees them is not real data: it traces to a 2012 sales pitch by Preptel, a resume-optimisation vendor that folded in 2013, and no supporting methodology was ever published (Uncharted Career, The Interview Guys). Recruiter-side research suggests the large majority of applications do get human review, and only a small minority of recruiters configure content-based auto-rejection. The real 2026 gatekeeper is subtler: an AI layer that reads, summarises and ranks candidates on top of the old keyword filter (Jobscan) — a low-ranked resume is rarely auto-rejected, but it is read last, skimmed hardest and easiest to pass over.

2. AI-written resumes lost their edge. Roughly 78% of job applications now carry AI-generated content, and more than half of job seekers produce their resume directly in ChatGPT (WasItAIGenerated). When everyone submits similar AI prose, generic AI output stops standing out and starts hurting: a March 2026 Robert Half survey found 67% of US HR leaders say reviewing AI-generated applications has slowed their hiring process — 20% report delays of over two weeks — and 84% report heavier team workloads from the influx (Robert Half, Forbes).

3. Matching beat detection. No major ATS reliably detects whether a resume was written by AI; instead, every major ATS now uses AI to score how well an application matches the job (Jobscan). That distinction is the most important thing to understand in 2026: the system is grading relevance to the specific posting, not policing your writing tool. Keyword-matched resumes are roughly three times more likely to reach a recruiter than unoptimised ones (SelectSoftwareReviews).

4. The application flood created a “doom loop”. Applications per hire tripled between 2021 and 2024 and stayed above 300 per hire through 2025 (WasItAIGenerated). Recruiters respond by tightening AI filters; candidates respond by adding more AI tools; the pipeline gets less efficient for everyone. The average posting draws 250-plus applicants, of whom only four to six are interviewed (SelectSoftwareReviews).

5. Dedicated builders pulled ahead of raw chatbots on outcomes. A general assistant writes fluent bullet points but cannot format a document, optimise it for ATS parsing or export a finished file. In one 2026 experiment, resumes built in ChatGPT alone passed ATS screening about 29% of the time versus 71% for dedicated AI resume tools (CareerBldr). Treat that as one vendor-run test rather than gospel, but the direction is consistent across reviews: the winning workflow is a chatbot for words plus a dedicated builder for structure, ATS formatting and export.

How AI reads your resume in 2026

Your resume now passes through two automated gates before a person reads it. Understanding both is what separates a resume that gets seen from one that vanishes.

• Parsing. The ATS first converts your file into structured data — name, roles, dates, skills. Complex layouts break this step: multi-column designs, tables, text boxes, graphics, and details hidden in headers or footers can be misread or dropped entirely. A clean, single-column layout with standard section headings parses most reliably, which is why heavily designed templates carry a hidden risk.
• Keyword matching. The system compares your text against the job description and produces a match score across hard skills, job titles, soft skills, education and other keywords. Jobscan, which scores against more than 30 parameters, recommends aiming for a 75% match or higher, the point where callback odds improve markedly (Jobscan).
• AI ranking. New in 2026, a language-model layer reads and summarises each application and ranks candidates for the recruiter. It rewards clear, specific, evidence-backed writing and is unimpressed by generic filler — the same qualities that make a resume good for a human reader.

The practical implication is consistent across all three gates: optimise for the specific job, keep the formatting clean, lead every bullet with a quantified achievement, and mirror the language of the posting without stuffing keywords. The resume that reads well to a person now also scores well with the machine — the two goals have converged.

Top AI resume tools by job (July 2026)

There is no single benchmark for resumes the way SWE-bench exists for coding, so the useful comparison is by job to be done. This table is the fast answer; detailed reviews follow.

Prices are each provider’s current published entry point as of July 2026, drawn from vendor pricing pages and third-party reviews where noted; resume-tool pricing changes and often auto-renews, so verify before you subscribe.

The best AI resume tools, reviewed

We have ordered these by overall standing for the most common job — producing a tailored, ATS-ready resume without overpaying or getting trapped in a subscription.

1. Teal — best all-round, best free builder + tracker

Price: Free (unlimited resumes, unlimited job tracking, 10 templates, limited AI credits, Chrome extension, Career Hub); Teal+ from roughly $9/week, $29/month or $79/quarter (Teal) Access: Web app, Chrome extension for saving job postings Standout: Job application tracker plus per-posting resume tailoring in one workspace

Teal is the tool most job seekers should start with because its free tier does more than most rivals charge for. You can build unlimited resumes, save job postings with a Chrome extension, tailor a resume to each posting, and track every application through the pipeline without paying. Teal+ unlocks unlimited AI credits for the bullet-point generator, summary writer and cover-letter tool, plus the resume-to-job match scorer and analytics. Teal markets that its users “land interviews 6x faster” — treat that as the company’s own figure, not an independent result.

Why it wins: The free plan is genuinely usable end to end, and the built-in tracker turns a scattered job search into an organised one. Per-job tailoring is front and centre, which is exactly what the 2026 matching-over-detection reality rewards.

Limitations: Teal+ pricing is quoted inconsistently across reviews (from about $9/month to $29/month depending on billing period and source), so confirm the current rate before subscribing. AI credits are capped on the free tier.

Best for: Almost anyone running an active search who wants to build, tailor and track in one free tool.

2. Rezi — best for ATS optimisation

Price: Free ($0 — one resume, limited AI tools, three PDF downloads); Pro $29/month (unlimited resumes and AI, one monthly expert review); Lifetime $149 one-time; 30-day money-back guarantee (Rezi) Access: Web app Standout: Transparent 23-point ATS scoring system

Rezi is built ATS-first, prioritising technical compatibility over visual flourish. Its 23-point scoring system checks your resume against the mechanics that determine whether it parses and ranks, and its Keyword Targeting tool aligns your content to a specific job description. Reviewers rate it 4.4 out of 5 on Trustpilot, praising its speed and clear feedback. The Lifetime plan at $149 is the standout value in the category for anyone who expects to job-hunt more than once.

Why it wins: The most transparent ATS scoring of any builder, plus a one-time Lifetime option that avoids the recurring-subscription trap common elsewhere.

Limitations: Templates are functional rather than beautiful — this is a compatibility tool, not a design studio. The free tier is genuinely limited (one resume, three downloads).

Best for: Job seekers applying through corporate ATS pipelines who want to maximise match rate and buy once.

3. Kickresume — best design plus AI drafting

Price: Free ($0); Monthly $24; Quarterly $54 (about $18/month); Yearly $96 (about $8/month); 14-day money-back guarantee (Kickresume) Access: Web app, mobile app Standout: 40-plus polished templates with an integrated AI writer and ATS checker

Kickresume pairs some of the best-looking templates in the category with a GPT-4-class AI writer for resumes and cover letters. Paid tiers unlock all 40-plus templates, unlimited colours and typefaces, the ATS Resume Checker, Career Map, LinkedIn and PDF import, website templates and a mobile app. It holds a 4.6 out of 5 Trustpilot rating, the highest of the major builders, and the yearly plan at roughly $8/month is competitively priced.

Why it wins: The strongest blend of design polish and AI drafting, with an ATS checker built in and a genuinely cheap annual plan.

Limitations: The monthly plan ($24) is poor value against the yearly; reporting on the exact underlying model varies (sources cite both GPT-4.1 and older GPT-3-era engines), so treat model claims cautiously. Design-forward templates still need a clean variant for strict ATS.

Best for: Job seekers who want an attractive, professionally designed resume without sacrificing ATS compatibility, on an annual budget.

4. Enhancv — best for visual, distinctive resumes

Price: 7-day free trial (no card; caps 12 section items and adds branding); Pro Monthly $19.99; Pro Quarterly $39.99 (about $13.33/month); entry plans from around $16.50/month (Enhancv) Access: Web app Standout: Highly customisable, design-led templates plus resume translation

Enhancv is the pick when visual differentiation matters — think creative, marketing and design roles where a distinctive layout helps rather than hurts. It offers graphs, charts, custom sections and unusually flexible styling, alongside practical AI features: a resume-tailoring tool where you paste a job ad to see what to include, resume translation across languages including French, German, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese and Hindi, an AI job-application tracker and an objective generator.

Why it wins: The best-looking creative templates in the category, plus multilingual translation and a tailoring workflow aimed at ATS keywords.

Limitations: No true free plan — the 7-day trial caps content and adds branding, and you cannot export an unbranded resume without upgrading. Heavily designed templates can trip strict ATS parsers, so use a simpler layout when applying through job portals.

Best for: Creative and senior professionals who want a standout design and are applying somewhere design is an asset, not a parsing risk.

5. Jobscan — best ATS scanner (works with any resume)

Price: Free (5 scans/month); Premium $49.95/month, $89.95/quarter (about $29.98/month) or $179/year (Jobscan) Access: Web app, resume and LinkedIn optimisation tools Standout: The most granular resume-to-job match report in the category

Jobscan is not a builder — it is an optimiser you run after building a resume anywhere else. Paste your resume and a job description and it returns a detailed match-rate report: keyword gaps, hard- and soft-skill analysis, formatting flags and title alignment across more than 30 parameters. It recommends a 75% match or higher, and its data shows keyword-optimised resumes reach recruiters roughly three times more often. It is the most precise keyword analyser available and pairs with any builder.

Why it wins: Unmatched granularity on the one metric that most determines whether your resume reaches a human — job-specific match rate.

Limitations: Premium is the most expensive subscription here, and five free scans a month goes quickly during an active search. It optimises but does not design or write.

Best for: Applicants targeting specific roles who want to measure and lift their match rate before hitting submit.

6. Zety, Resume Genius and Resume.io — popular, but watch the billing

Price (Zety): $1.95 trial that auto-renews at $25.95 every four weeks (13 charges a year), or $71.40/year (about $5.95/month) (PitchMeAI) Price (Resume Genius): $2.95 for 14 days, then $23.95 every four weeks, or $95.40/year (about $7.95/month) (ResuFit) Standout: Fast, template-driven building — undercut by paywalls and auto-renewal complaints

Zety, Resume Genius and Resume.io are among the most-used and best-rated resume builders on raw output — Resume Genius holds 4.5 on Trustpilot across 43,000-plus reviews, Zety 4.2 across 11,600-plus — and all three use GPT-4-class AI to suggest summaries, bullet points and skills. The consistent problem is commercial, not creative. Each markets a “free” build, then paywalls the download: free tiers export only plain-text (.txt) files, and a usable PDF or Word document requires payment after you have invested 30 to 60 minutes. Reviews across all three cite the same pattern — a low-priced trial that auto-renews at a much higher four-weekly rate, plus cancellation friction.

Why they matter: Genuinely quick, polished results and large template libraries, if you know the pricing model going in.

Limitations: The download paywall and aggressive auto-renewal are the category’s worst, and Zety’s four-weekly billing means 13 charges a year rather than 12. If you use one, buy the annual plan deliberately and set a cancellation reminder.

Best for: People who want a single polished resume fast, are comfortable managing a subscription tightly, and will not be caught by the .txt export limit.

7. Canva and Novoresume — best free design routes

Price (Canva): Free tier (most templates, basic Magic Write AI); Premium $29.99/month (Canva) Price (Novoresume): Free (one resume, basic template, watermark); Premium from about $19.99/month or $139.99/year (Novoresume) Standout: Canva’s free template library is the largest available

Canva offers the biggest free library of resume designs plus its Magic Write AI for drafting section content and full drag-and-drop control of layout, colour and type. Novoresume, used by more than 18 million job seekers, gives a clean free single-resume builder but locks AI content and most templates behind Premium and adds a watermark on free exports.

Why they matter: Canva is the best route to a good-looking resume at zero cost; Novoresume is a tidy, structured free builder for a simple one-pager.

Limitations: Canva’s most elaborate templates are exactly the ones that break ATS parsing, so stick to its simplest single-column designs when applying through portals. Novoresume’s free tier is narrow and watermarked.

Best for: Budget-conscious applicants who want design control (Canva) or a clean, simple free build (Novoresume) — both best for roles or channels where a resume is read by a person, not only a parser.

General AI assistants: the free writing layer

Before paying for any builder, most of the writing in a resume — bullet points, a professional summary, keyword extraction from a job ad, a tailored cover letter — can be done in a general assistant. This is where AI is genuinely strong and free.

ChatGPT (OpenAI), now led by GPT-5.6 Sol with the faster GPT-5.5 as its everyday default, is the most widely used and turns a blank page into structured, professional text in seconds. Claude (Anthropic), powered by Claude Opus 4.8, is the strongest pick for tone, concise editing and rewriting achievements without inflation. Gemini (Google), running the Gemini 3.5 line, is convenient inside Google Workspace. All three have capable free tiers that cover most resume-writing needs; paid plans are $20/month.

The limitation is decisive: a chatbot generates strong raw text but cannot format a resume, guarantee ATS-safe structure or export a finished document, and a resume built in ChatGPT alone passed ATS screening roughly 29% of the time against 71% for dedicated tools in one 2026 test (CareerBldr). The strongest results come from combining the two: draft and refine wording in an assistant, then build, ATS-format and export in a dedicated tool. For sharper prompts, give the assistant your target role, seniority, team size and specific measurable achievements rather than asking for a generic resume.

Best for: Every job seeker as the free writing layer. See our best AI for writing guide for a deeper head-to-head, and best free AI writing tools for the zero-cost options.

Feature comparison: the full matrix

Which AI resume tool should you use?

Best overall for most job seekers

Winner: Teal (free; Teal+ from ~$9/week)

A free, genuinely usable builder plus per-job tailoring and an application tracker in one workspace. It matches how hiring actually works in 2026 — tailor to each posting, track everything. Alternative: Rezi if ATS scoring matters more than tracking.

Best for beating ATS filters

Winner: Rezi ($29/month or $149 lifetime), paired with Jobscan

Rezi’s 23-point score builds an ATS-ready resume; Jobscan measures its match rate against each specific job. Aim for 75% or higher. This pair does more for callback odds than any template choice.

Best free option

Winner: Teal (free builder + tracker) or Canva (free design)

Teal for an end-to-end free build and tracker; Canva for the largest free template library; the free tiers of ChatGPT and Claude for the writing. Avoid “free” builders that only export .txt and paywall the PDF.

Best for writing and cover letters

Winner: ChatGPT or Claude (free–$20/month)

Unbeatable for drafting bullet points, summaries and tailored cover letters — then move the text into a dedicated builder to format and export. See best free AI writing tools.

Best for design-led resumes

Winner: Enhancv (from ~$16.50/month) or Kickresume (from ~$8/month)

Enhancv for creative, distinctive layouts; Kickresume for polished templates with the best Trustpilot rating. Keep a clean single-column version for strict ATS pipelines.

Best value paid plan

Winner: Rezi Lifetime ($149 one-time) or Kickresume Yearly ($96)

A one-time Lifetime licence or a cheap annual plan beats the four-weekly auto-renewing trials that dominate this category.

Best to avoid overpaying

Watch: Zety, Resume Genius and Resume.io billing

All three build well but paywall downloads and auto-renew low trials at much higher four-weekly rates. If you use them, pick the annual plan on purpose and diarise the cancellation date.

Pricing comparison: what you’ll actually pay

Cost strategy: most job seekers need to spend nothing. Draft in a free assistant, build and track in Teal’s free tier, and run a couple of free Jobscan scans on your most-wanted roles. Pay only when you need Rezi’s or Jobscan’s paid depth for a competitive search — and prefer a one-time Lifetime or annual plan over a four-weekly auto-renew.

Will an AI-written resume hurt your chances?

This is the question that should shape how you use every tool above, and the 2026 evidence is nuanced.

First, the reassuring part: no major ATS reliably detects AI-written resumes, and auto-rejection purely for AI use is still rare (Jobscan). What the systems actually do is score relevance to the job, so using AI to write is not itself a red flag. Some companies — a small but growing number — have begun flagging or auto-rejecting applications identified as AI-generated, but this is the exception, not the rule.

Now the real risk, which is human, not automated. Because roughly 78% of applications now contain AI content, generic AI prose has become a negative signal to the recruiters who read the shortlist (WasItAIGenerated). Two-thirds of HR leaders say AI-generated applications have slowed their process, and reporting describes AI resumes “backfiring” precisely because they read as interchangeable (Forbes). The failure mode is not “you used AI”; it is “your resume sounds like everyone else’s.”

The takeaway is practical. Use AI to draft and tailor, then make the result specific and true: real metrics, real project names, your actual voice. Never let AI invent achievements — fabrications surface in interviews and reference checks. Tailor to each posting rather than mass-applying with one AI resume, which is what the matching layer rewards and what the “doom loop” of mass AI applications punishes. AI is a strong first draft and a poor final answer.

What recruiters and job seekers actually think

Recruiters are drowning in sameness. The dominant 2026 sentiment is fatigue: 84% of HR teams report heavier workloads and 67% of HR leaders say AI applications have slowed hiring (Robert Half). The complaint is rarely “candidates used AI” and usually “every application looks the same.”

Job seekers feel the filter tighten. With AI ranking now deciding which applications get real attention first, applicants increasingly optimise for the machine — and the tools that measure match rate, like Jobscan, have become search staples rather than nice-to-haves (SelectSoftwareReviews).

The value has shifted from writing to tailoring. Reviews across the category converge on the same conclusion: raw AI writing is commoditised and nearly free, so the paid tools earn their keep on tailoring, ATS scoring, tracking and export — not on generating prose a free chatbot also produces (CareerBldr).

Recent developments (2025–2026)

AI became the primary resume reader. With 79% of organisations embedding AI in their ATS, an AI ranking layer now sits on top of keyword filtering as the default first reader of applications (SelectSoftwareReviews).

The AI-application flood hit recruiter workflows. Around 78% of applications now carry AI content and two-thirds of HR leaders report slower hiring as a result — turning “wrote it with AI” from an edge into table stakes, and generic AI output into a liability (Forbes).

LinkedIn rolled out its Premium Apply Assistant (June 2026). LinkedIn began gradually releasing an AI-powered application assistant to paid users, alongside its Premium-only resume builder and tailor-to-job review — capable but basic next to a dedicated builder (ResumeHog).

Match-rate optimisation went mainstream. Tools such as Jobscan and Rezi that score resumes against a specific job description moved from power-user tools to standard practice as the 75% match target became common advice (Jobscan).

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI for writing a resume in 2026?

There is no single winner — it depends on the job. For an all-round free build with tailoring and a job tracker, use Teal. For maximising ATS match rate, Rezi (23-point scoring) paired with Jobscan (match-rate scanner). For polished design, Kickresume or Enhancv. For the writing itself, ChatGPT or Claude on their free tiers. Most people should draft in a free assistant and build in a dedicated tool.

Can I just use ChatGPT to write my resume?

You can write the content in ChatGPT for free — bullet points, a summary, a tailored cover letter — but it cannot format a resume, guarantee ATS-safe structure or export a finished file. In one 2026 test, ChatGPT-only resumes passed ATS screening about 29% of the time versus 71% for dedicated tools (CareerBldr). The best approach is to draft in ChatGPT or Claude, then build and export in a tool like Teal or Rezi.

Will an AI-written resume get rejected by an ATS?

Not for being AI-written. No major ATS reliably detects AI authorship; they score how well your resume matches the job (Jobscan). Rejection comes from a low match rate or a layout the parser cannot read, not from your writing tool. Tailor to the posting, aim for a 75%-plus match, and use a clean single-column format.

Do recruiters know if my resume was written by AI?

Usually not with certainty, but generic AI writing is now easy to spot because roughly 78% of applications contain AI content and much of it reads the same (WasItAIGenerated). Two-thirds of HR leaders say AI applications have slowed hiring, and interchangeable AI resumes are “backfiring” (Forbes). Use AI to draft, then make it specific with real metrics and your own voice.

What is the best free AI resume builder?

Teal has the most capable free tier — an unlimited builder, per-job tailoring and an application tracker at no cost. Canva offers the largest free template library, and the free tiers of ChatGPT and Claude handle the writing. Avoid builders like Zety and Resume Genius whose free tier only exports a plain-text file and paywalls the PDF.

How do I get my resume past an ATS?

Use a clean, single-column layout with standard section headings, avoid tables, graphics, text boxes and details in headers or footers, and mirror the job description’s keywords naturally. Score your resume with Jobscan or Rezi and aim for a 75%-plus match, since keyword-matched resumes reach recruiters roughly three times as often (SelectSoftwareReviews).

Is Teal or Jobscan better?

They do different jobs. Teal builds and tailors your resume and tracks applications; Jobscan does not build anything but gives the most granular match-rate report against a specific job. Many people use both — build in Teal, then scan the result in Jobscan before applying.

Are paid resume builders worth it over free tools?

Only for specific needs. Free tools now cover writing (ChatGPT, Claude) and building and tracking (Teal, Canva). Paid plans earn their price on ATS scoring depth (Rezi, Jobscan), premium design (Enhancv, Kickresume) and unbranded export — not on writing quality, which is commoditised. If you pay, prefer a one-time Lifetime or annual plan over a four-weekly auto-renewing trial.

What is the safest way to avoid resume-builder subscription traps?

Check the download terms before you start. Several popular builders (Zety, Resume Genius, Resume.io) let you build for “free” but only export plain text, then charge for the PDF via a low trial that auto-renews at a higher four-weekly rate. Choose tools with genuine free exports (Teal, Canva) or one-time pricing (Rezi Lifetime), and if you take a trial, set a cancellation reminder immediately.

Conclusion: how to choose in July 2026

The resume game changed when the first reader became a machine and the second became a fatigued recruiter buried in identical AI applications. The tools that win are the ones that help you tailor and optimise, not just generate.

• Best all-round: Teal — free builder, tailoring and job tracker in one.
• Best for ATS: Rezi (23-point scoring) plus Jobscan (match-rate scanner).
• Best writing help: ChatGPT or Claude — free, then build and export elsewhere.
• Best design: Enhancv or Kickresume — with a clean ATS-safe version.
• Best free: Teal or Canva; avoid .txt-only “free” builders.
• Best value paid: Rezi Lifetime ($149) or Kickresume Yearly ($96).

The single rule that governs all of it: AI is a strong first draft, never the final one. Draft with a free assistant, build and tailor in a dedicated tool, score your match rate against each specific job, and then make the resume unmistakably yours with real, verifiable achievements. Do that and AI is genuine leverage; skip it and you join the flood that recruiters are learning to filter out. For related reading, see our guides to the best AI for writing, the best free AI writing tools, the best AI for business, the best AI headshot generators for a matching LinkedIn photo, and the wider guides hub.

This guide is updated as resume tools, pricing and hiring-AI behaviour evolve. Resume-builder pricing changes often, auto-renews on non-standard cycles and varies by source; figures reflect each provider’s current published plans and third-party reviews where noted, and ATS and adoption statistics vary by survey — verify pricing and terms with the provider before subscribing.