education
Best AI for College Students
Compare the best AI tools for college and university students as of June 2026 — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, NotebookLM and more — with the current student offers, picks for essays, research, STEM and coding, and honest academic-integrity guidance.
Quick answer: For most college students in 2026, the best free starting point is ChatGPT — its Study Mode is free for every logged-in user and is built to teach rather than hand over answers. For research papers that need verifiable citations, Perplexity sources every claim and offers verified students a discounted Education Pro plan (around $10/month). For essays and dense readings, Claude runs Opus 4.8 — the strongest model you can currently use — and its Learning Mode makes you do the thinking; if your university is a Claude for Education partner, you get Pro-equivalent access free. For turning your own lecture notes into study materials, NotebookLM is free and the standout study tool of 2026. For maths and the sciences, Wolfram Alpha computes answers a chatbot still gets wrong.
The tool you pick matters less than how you use it. AI is now near-universal on campus — 95% of UK undergraduates and a majority of US students use it — so the questions that decide your degree are which offers you claim, which tasks each tool is actually best at, and how you stay on the right side of your institution’s academic-integrity rules. This guide answers all three, with current pricing, college-specific recommendations and the detection reality that hits international students hardest.
This page is written for the college and university level — undergraduate essays, research papers, problem sets, exam revision and coding coursework, plus a note on dissertations. For a full breakdown by education level (including school-age learners), see our broader best AI for students guide.
The current state of AI for college students: June 2026
AI use in higher education is no longer the exception — it is the default, and the tools have shifted from answering to teaching.
In the UK, 95% of undergraduates now use generative AI, up from 92% in 2025 and 66% in 2024 (HEPI Student Generative AI Survey 2026, 1,054 full-time undergraduates surveyed by Savanta in December 2025). 94% use it specifically to help with assessed work, and the share admitting they put AI-generated text directly into assessments has climbed to 12%, up from 8% in 2025 and 3% in 2024. Nearly two-thirds (65%) say assessment itself has changed significantly in response.
In the US, the picture is the same shape. 57% of college students use AI at least weekly for coursework, and about one in five use it daily (Lumina Foundation–Gallup, April 2026, based on roughly 3,800 students). The most common uses are getting help with material they do not understand (64%), checking answers (60%), editing or improving writing (54%) and summarising lectures or notes (54%). Yet 53% say their institution discourages or prohibits AI, and 52% report that at least some classes give no clear guidance — the policy gap, not the technology, is the live problem on campus.
Two developments matter more than any single benchmark for students.
First, every major lab now ships a “learning mode.” ChatGPT’s Study Mode (free for all users), Claude’s Learning Mode and Gemini’s Guided Learning all use Socratic questioning to guide you toward an answer rather than dumping it on you. The default behaviour of these tools has moved from “answer machine” toward “tutor”, and the teaching version is increasingly free.
Second, the free-money era has tightened. A year ago you could stack hundreds of dollars of premium tools at no cost. Several of those offers have since expired or converted to discounts: Google’s free year of AI Pro ended (final US redemption was 30 April 2026), and Perplexity’s free-month referral promotions have largely wound down. The free stack is still real and worth claiming — it is just smaller and more conditional than it was, so the details below are current as of June 2026.
Top AI tools for college students (June 2026)
How the major tools compare for college use, with the models that power them and the offers that are still live. Prices are in USD.
| Tool | Powered by | Best for | Free tier | Current student offer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | GPT-5.5 | General coursework, explanation, brainstorming | Yes — incl. free Study Mode | No broad discount; Go plan $8/mo; Edu via campus |
| Claude | Opus 4.8 / Sonnet 4.6 | Essays, analysis, long readings | Yes — incl. Learning Mode | Free Pro-equivalent at Claude for Education universities |
| Perplexity | Multi-model | Research papers with citations | Yes — limited Pro searches | Education Pro ~$10/mo (verified .edu/.ac.uk) |
| Gemini | Gemini 3.5 Pro | Google Workspace users, exam quizzes | Yes — incl. Guided Learning | Free year ended; ~$9.99/mo student rate |
| NotebookLM | Gemini | Study materials from your own notes | Yes — full features | Free; Pro features via Google AI Pro ~$9.99/mo |
| Microsoft Copilot | GPT + in-house | Writing in Office, data, slides | Yes — Copilot Chat | M365 Premium free 12 months (then $19.99/mo) |
| GitHub Copilot | Multi-model | Coding and CS coursework | Limited | Copilot Student plan via Student Developer Pack |
| Wolfram Alpha | Computational | Maths, physics, engineering accuracy | Yes — answers only | Student Pro pricing |
| Khanmigo | GPT-class | Tutoring that teaches, not tells | No | $4/mo ($44/yr) |
| Quizlet | AI flashcards | Memorisation and test prep | Yes — ad-supported | Plus $35.99/yr |
The bottom line: before paying for anything, switch on the free Study and Learning modes, use NotebookLM for revision, and claim the offers your student status unlocks. For most students, Claude for Education or Microsoft 365 access plus free NotebookLM already covers the essentials.
The tools in depth
ChatGPT — the versatile default
Model: GPT-5.5 | Free tier: yes, incl. Study Mode | Paid: Go $8/mo, Plus $20/mo Best for: explaining coursework, brainstorming, general study
Most students start with ChatGPT, and it is a fair default — the broadest capability, the largest ecosystem of guides, and the free Study Mode that asks clarifying questions, gives hints rather than solutions, and generates practice problems at your level. OpenAI built Study Mode with input from pedagogy experts at more than 40 institutions and has since layered on interactive lessons across 70-plus maths and science topics. There is still no broad student discount — OpenAI’s 2025 free-Plus promotion ended and was not replaced — but the Go plan at $8/month is a cheaper step up than Plus if you hit free-tier limits, and ChatGPT Edu may be available through your campus.
Use it well: “Guide me through solving this integral with hints — don’t give me the final answer until I’ve tried each step.” Then upload your lecture slides and ask it to quiz you, explaining everything you get wrong.
Limitations: the free tier runs a weaker model (GPT-5.3) and shows ads in some regions; for citations you can actually verify, Perplexity is better.
Claude — the essay and reading specialist
Models: Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6 | Free tier: yes, incl. Learning Mode | Pro: $20/mo ($17 annual) Best for: essay feedback, dense readings, nuanced analysis
Claude is the consistent favourite for writing-heavy degrees — students report it produces more natural prose with less of the generic filler that makes AI text obvious. It runs Opus 4.8, the strongest model you can currently use (88.6% on SWE-bench Verified and category-leading professional knowledge work), and its 1M-token context on both Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 4.6 lets you load an entire textbook, a full lecture series or several papers and reason across all of them at once. Learning Mode keeps it from doing your thinking, responding with questions like “What evidence supports that?” rather than an answer.
If your university is a Claude for Education partner (2026 partners include the LSE, Northeastern, Dartmouth, Syracuse and the University of Virginia, among others), signing in with your .edu email upgrades you to Pro-equivalent access free, with enterprise privacy — your chats are not used for training.
Use it well: “Here’s my essay draft. Don’t rewrite it — identify the three weakest arguments and explain why they’re unconvincing, then suggest how I’d strengthen them in my own voice.”
Limitations: no public student discount unless your university partners; the free tier (Sonnet 4.6, no Opus) is more limited than ChatGPT’s.
Perplexity — research papers with real citations
Free tier: limited Pro searches per day | Education Pro: ~$10/month (verified students) Best for: literature searches, fact-checking, anything that needs references
Perplexity’s decisive feature for college work is that every answer carries source citations — when you are writing a paper that needs references, that matters enormously. Verified students get Education Pro at roughly $10/month (half the standard $20 Pro price) after .edu or .ac.uk verification; Perplexity has periodically run promotions for free Pro months (such as via its Comet browser referral programme), but those come and go, so check perplexity.ai/students for the current terms.
Use it well: use Perplexity to discover sources and orient yourself, then click through and read the originals before citing anything. Treat its summaries as a map, not a destination.
Limitations: like every model, it can be confidently wrong on niche topics — always verify before you cite.
Gemini — for Google campuses and exam prep
Models: Gemini 3.5 Pro / 3.1 Pro | Free tier: yes, incl. Guided Learning | Student rate: ~$9.99/mo Best for: Google Workspace integration, search-grounded answers, practice quizzes
If your university runs Google Workspace, Gemini becomes a lot more useful — it can search your Drive, pull from Gmail and work inside Docs and Slides. Any student aged 18 or over can generate custom practice quizzes that give hints, explain right and wrong answers, and summarise at the end, which is genuinely good for exam prep. It is also the front door to NotebookLM, the standout free study tool below. The headline free year has ended, but the standard Gemini tier remains free and capable.
Limitations: for the deepest reasoning, Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 still edge it; the best free perks now sit in NotebookLM rather than the paid tier.
NotebookLM — turn your notes into a tutor
Price: free (Pro features via Google AI Pro, ~$9.99/mo student) Best for: transforming your own lecture notes and readings into revision materials
NotebookLM is the breakout free tool of 2026 for students. Upload your slides, textbook PDFs and papers, and it builds study guides, practice questions, summaries and audio overviews grounded only in your sources — which sharply reduces hallucination and keeps everything relevant to your class rather than the open internet. The free Standard tier needs no verification; a .edu email unlocks NotebookLM Pro for about $9.99/month if you outgrow it. If you claim nothing else on this page, use this.
Microsoft Copilot — inside the apps you submit work in
Best for: drafting in Word, data in Excel, building decks in PowerPoint
Microsoft Copilot’s strength is being inside the Office apps you already use for coursework. Eligible students can get Microsoft 365 Premium free for 12 months (then $19.99/month), which puts Copilot in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote and Outlook, plus 1TB of OneDrive. Copilot Chat is free with a school account, and Microsoft’s Study and Learn Agent adds adaptive flashcards and quizzes. The standalone free Copilot chat is less capable than ChatGPT or Claude — the value is the Office integration.
Specialised tools that beat the chatbots
General assistants are versatile, but purpose-built tools often win for specific college jobs.
- Wolfram Alpha computes rather than generates, making it far more reliable than a chatbot for calculus, linear algebra, statistics and chemistry; Pro (with student pricing) adds step-by-step methodology. For any module where a wrong number costs marks, this is the safety net.
- Khanmigo ($4/month) is built to never hand over the answer — it walks you to it with Socratic questioning across maths, the sciences and standardised-test prep.
- Photomath (free; Plus around $9.99/month) shows animated, step-by-step workings for a problem you point your camera at — better than asking a chatbot, which still makes arithmetic slips.
- Quizlet ($35.99/year; free Knowt is a strong no-cost alternative) turns notes into flashcards and runs adaptive spaced repetition — the two techniques cognitive science rates most effective.
- Elicit and Consensus search the academic literature directly for systematic reviews and peer-reviewed evidence — essential once you reach final-year projects and dissertations.
Feature comparison: the college matrix
What each tool actually does for student work. “Limited” means available but capped or not a headline strength.
| Feature | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Perplexity | Copilot | NotebookLM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning mode | Study Mode (free) | Learning Mode | Guided Learning | Study focus | Study agent | Source-grounded |
| Cited research | Limited | Limited | Yes (grounded) | Yes (every answer) | Yes | Yes (your sources) |
| Upload notes / PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (core feature) |
| Long readings | Good | Best (1M context) | Best (2M context) | Good | Good | Source-bound |
| Practice quizzes | Yes | Via prompt | Yes (built-in) | Limited | Yes (agent) | Yes |
| Works inside Office / Docs | — | — | Google Workspace | — | Microsoft 365 | — |
| Free-tier quality | Good (GPT-5.3, ads) | Good (Sonnet 4.6) | Excellent | Good (limited Pro) | Good | Excellent (free) |
The pattern: ChatGPT is the most complete generalist, Claude is the deepest reader and writer, Gemini and Copilot win when you live in Google or Microsoft tools, Perplexity owns cited research, and NotebookLM is the best free revision engine — most students end up running two or three rather than committing to one.
Best AI for each college task
The single “best” tool depends on the assignment in front of you. Here are the decisive picks.
For essays and written assignments
Winner: Claude (Opus 4.8) — for feedback, not first drafts
Claude produces the most natural prose and follows complex style and referencing requirements best. Use it on essays you write — ask it to find weak arguments, logical gaps and unsupported claims, not to rewrite. See our best AI for essays and best AI for writing guides for the full comparison.
For research papers and citations
Winner: Perplexity, backed by Elicit
Perplexity cites every answer, so you can verify and follow sources; Elicit and Consensus go deeper into peer-reviewed literature for reviews. Always read the original before citing. More in best AI for research.
For maths, STEM and problem sets
Winner: Wolfram Alpha for the answer, Khanmigo for the method
Wolfram Alpha computes reliably where chatbots still slip on arithmetic; Khanmigo and Photomath teach the steps. Reserve a general model such as Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5 for explaining concepts, not for final numbers.
For coding and computer-science coursework
Winner: GitHub Copilot (Student plan) plus Claude
Verified students get GitHub Copilot through the Student Developer Pack, which also bundles JetBrains IDEs and cloud credits; pair it with Claude for explaining unfamiliar code. For the full tool landscape, see best AI for coding.
For exam revision and test prep
Winner: NotebookLM plus Quizlet or Gemini quizzes
NotebookLM builds revision guides and audio overviews grounded only in your own notes; Quizlet and Gemini’s quiz generator handle spaced repetition and self-testing. This combination beats re-reading slides.
For lecture notes and study materials
Winner: NotebookLM (free)
Upload your slides, readings and recordings and it produces summaries, study guides and practice questions tied to your sources — the single highest-value free tool for most students.
For a zero-budget setup
Winner: ChatGPT Study Mode + Claude Learning Mode + NotebookLM
All three are free and built to make you think. Add Perplexity’s free daily Pro searches for cited research and Wolfram Alpha’s free tier for STEM, and you have a complete study stack without paying anything.
For final-year projects and dissertations
Winner: Claude (1M context) plus Elicit and Consensus
At this level you are producing original work, not learning settled facts. Claude handles synthesis and analysis across long documents; Elicit and Consensus map the literature. Most supervisors want to see your authentic reasoning, so use these for synthesis and polish, not thinking. See best AI for research.
Free and discounted student access (current as of June 2026)
The map has changed since last year. Here is what is actually claimable now, what each is worth, and the catch.
Claude for Education — free Pro-equivalent (if your university partners)
If your institution is a Claude for Education partner, you get Claude Pro-equivalent access free, with Learning Mode and enterprise privacy. There is no public sign-up — it is institution by institution — so check whether your university participates, and lobby your department if it does not. Best for writing-heavy degrees and long readings.
Microsoft 365 Premium with Copilot — free 12 months
Eligible college students can get Microsoft 365 Premium free for 12 months (then $19.99/month), putting Copilot inside Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote and Outlook plus 1TB of OneDrive. Best for students whose universities run on Microsoft tools.
Perplexity Education — discounted Pro
Verified students get Education Pro at around $10/month (half price). Perplexity runs periodic free-Pro promotions, but they come and go — verify the current offer at perplexity.ai/students. Best for research papers and cited sources.
GitHub Copilot — Student plan via the Developer Pack
Verified students get Copilot through the GitHub Student Developer Pack, which also bundles JetBrains IDEs, cloud credits and dozens of other developer tools. Best for computer-science students and anyone learning to code.
NotebookLM — free, no verification needed
The free Standard tier needs no student status; a .edu email unlocks Pro features via Google AI Pro (~$9.99/month) if you outgrow it. The best free study tool on this list.
Google AI Pro — the free year has ended
Worth stating plainly because it is widely (and wrongly) still cited as live: Google’s free year of AI Pro for students has ended — the final US redemption window closed on 30 April 2026. What remains is a one-month trial and a student rate around $9.99/month. The genuinely free path with Google now is the standard Gemini tier plus NotebookLM.
Reality check: offers and deadlines move fast. Verify the current terms on the provider’s own page before relying on any of these, and never enter card details for something advertised as free.
Pricing: what these actually cost
Monthly prices in USD, current as of June 2026. These are global tools and most bill in dollars — check your region for local pricing.
Free options that are genuinely useful for college
| Tool | Free tier | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | GPT-5.5 access + free Study Mode | Rate limits at peak; ads in some regions |
| Claude | Sonnet 4.6 + Learning Mode | Daily usage limits; no Opus |
| Gemini | Guided Learning + quizzes | Deepest reasoning is paid |
| NotebookLM | Full features | Needs a Google account |
| Perplexity | Limited Pro searches/day | Heavy research needs Pro |
| Wolfram Alpha | Answers | No step-by-step working |
| Knowt | Full flashcards | — |
When free is not enough
| Tool | Student price | Regular price |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Go | $8/month | $8/month |
| Khanmigo | $4/month ($44/yr) | $4/month |
| Wolfram Alpha Pro | Student rate | ~$5–7/month |
| Quizlet Plus | $35.99/year | $35.99/year |
| Perplexity Education Pro | ~$10/month | $20/month |
| Gemini (Google AI Pro) | ~$9.99/month | $19.99/month |
| Microsoft 365 Premium | Free 12 months | $19.99/month |
The 2026 free stack: turn on ChatGPT Study Mode and Claude Learning Mode, use NotebookLM for revision, claim Claude for Education or Microsoft 365 if your university offers them, and grab GitHub Copilot if you code. After that, the highest-value paid add-ons are Khanmigo ($4/month) for tutoring and Wolfram Alpha for STEM accuracy.
Academic integrity: what college students need to know
This section matters more at university than at any earlier stage, because the policies are stricter and the detection tools are pointed at you.
Policies have shifted from bans to disclosure
Most universities have moved from blanket bans to course-specific rules. Common patterns: explicit instructor permission, mandatory disclosure where AI is allowed, and a growing reluctance to use detection tools for disciplinary decisions. The Gallup data shows why this is fraught — 52% of students say at least some classes give no clear guidance. Check your institution’s policy, read each syllabus, and when in doubt, ask, then disclose as required.
AI detection is unreliable — and biased against international students
Turnitin advertises 98%+ accuracy with under 1% false positives on documents above 20% AI content. Independent testing tells a harder story, and the bias against non-native English writers is the headline finding. A Stanford-led study found detectors falsely flagged TOEFL essays by non-native English speakers at a mean rate of 61.3%, versus 5.1% for essays by US students in the same test (Stanford HAI). The mechanism is structural: writing in a second language tends toward simpler vocabulary and more predictable structure — exactly the low-perplexity signature detectors associate with machines. Several institutions have stepped back from detection-led enforcement as a result.
How to use AI without needing to outsmart a detector
The goal is not to beat detection — it is to use AI in ways that genuinely help you learn, which also keeps you clear of trouble.
Do: use AI to understand concepts you are stuck on; generate practice problems and have it check your work; get feedback on drafts you wrote; brainstorm, then develop ideas in your own words; build revision materials from your notes.
Don’t: paste AI-generated text into assignments; have AI write sections and paraphrase them; ask it to “rewrite in my style”; or run your own writing through “humanisers” — that creates problems even for legitimate work.
How to cite AI when required
- APA:
OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (June 2026 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com - MLA:
"Prompt text" prompt. ChatGPT, OpenAI, 30 June 2026, chat.openai.com - Chicago: treat as personal communication in a footnote; usually omit from the bibliography.
Keep records of your prompts and how you used the outputs. If questioned, you can show your process — your best defence against a false flag.
What college students actually recommend
Threads on r/college and subject subreddits show consistent patterns about which tool wins which job.
| Use case | Student consensus |
|---|---|
| General coursework | ChatGPT (the all-rounder) |
| Better writing | Claude (“more human, less filler”) |
| Research papers | Perplexity (“actually cites sources”) |
| Maths accuracy | Wolfram Alpha (“indispensable”) |
| Revision materials | NotebookLM (“grounded in my own notes”) |
| Exam prep | Quizlet + Anki |
| Coding coursework | GitHub Copilot |
The loudest complaint is not capability — it is the anxiety of false AI-cheating accusations, especially among international students, followed by ChatGPT’s “buzzwords and filler” and rate limits during exam season. The strategy students who stay out of trouble describe is consistent: generate practice questions from your notes and test yourself, write your first draft yourself and ask Claude for structural feedback rather than a rewrite, research specifics in Perplexity, and keep the final words your own.
Recent developments reshaping the campus (Apr–Jun 2026)
Lumina–Gallup confirms AI is routine (Apr). A survey of roughly 3,800 US college students found 57% use AI at least weekly, even as 53% say their institution discourages it — quantifying the gap between student behaviour and campus policy (Gallup).
HEPI 2026 puts UK undergraduate use at 95% (Mar). Direct inclusion of AI-generated text in assessed work rose to 12%, and 65% of students say assessment has changed in response (HEPI).
Google’s free student year closed (30 Apr). The free 12-month AI Pro offer ended in the US, leaving a one-month trial and a ~$9.99/month student rate; NotebookLM remains free.
Learning modes went free and broad. ChatGPT Study Mode is now free for all logged-in users and has expanded to 70-plus interactive maths and science topics, cementing the shift from answer machines to tutors.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI for college students?
For most students, ChatGPT is the best free all-rounder (its Study Mode is free), Claude is best for essays and long readings, Perplexity is best for cited research, and NotebookLM is the best free tool for turning your own notes into revision materials. Most students use two or three depending on the task.
What is the best free AI for college students?
ChatGPT (free Study Mode), Claude (free Learning Mode) and NotebookLM (free) together form a complete study stack at no cost. Add Perplexity’s free daily searches for research and Wolfram Alpha’s free tier for maths.
Is there a student discount for ChatGPT?
No broad one. OpenAI’s 2025 free-Plus promotion ended and was not replaced. The Go plan at $8/month is the cheapest paid step, and ChatGPT Edu may be available through your campus.
Is Perplexity free for students?
Not universally. Verified students get Education Pro at around $10/month (half price); Perplexity runs occasional free-Pro promotions, but they come and go — check perplexity.ai/students for the current offer.
Is Google AI Pro still free for students?
No. The free year ended (final US redemption 30 April 2026). Students now get a one-month trial and a roughly $9.99/month rate. The free Gemini tier and NotebookLM remain free.
What is the best AI for writing college essays?
Claude produces the most natural writing and handles complex referencing best — but use it for feedback on essays you write yourself, not to write them. Ask it to find weak arguments and gaps, not to rewrite. See best AI for essays.
Will my professor know if I use AI?
Maybe — but detectors are unreliable, with false-positive rates above 60% for non-native English writers in Stanford testing. The better question is whether it matters: if you use AI to understand and then write in your own words, you are learning; if you submit AI-generated text, you are not, caught or not.
Is using AI for college work cheating?
It depends on your institution’s policy and how you use it. Understanding concepts, generating practice and getting feedback on your own work is generally fine; submitting AI-generated text as your own is cheating at most universities. Check your syllabus and ask your instructor.
Which AI is best for maths and STEM courses?
Wolfram Alpha computes reliably, Photomath shows worked steps, and Khanmigo teaches the method. Do not trust a general chatbot for final numbers — they still make arithmetic errors.
What is the best AI for computer-science students?
GitHub Copilot (free for verified students via the Student Developer Pack) for writing code, paired with Claude for explaining unfamiliar code. See best AI for coding for the full landscape.
The college student’s playbook for 2026
AI in higher education has matured past the hype into genuine usefulness, and the defining shift is that the tools now try to teach rather than just answer. Five priorities:
- Turn on the learning modes. ChatGPT Study Mode, Claude Learning Mode and Gemini Guided Learning are free and built to make you think.
- Claim what your status unlocks. Claude for Education and Microsoft 365 if your university offers them, the GitHub Copilot Student plan if you code, and free NotebookLM for everyone — verify the current terms, since offers move fast.
- Match the tool to the task. Claude for essays, Perplexity for research, Wolfram Alpha for maths, NotebookLM for revision, GitHub Copilot for code.
- Know your policies and disclose. Check institutional and course rules; transparency protects you, especially given how unreliable detection is.
- Use AI to learn, not to avoid learning, and verify everything. Check citations, confirm facts, and never treat an AI output as an authoritative source.
The students who come out ahead use AI to understand things they would otherwise struggle with and to practise more efficiently — not because AI did the work, but because it helped them do it better.
For the models behind these tools, see our best AI models ranking and best AI apps comparison; for a full breakdown by education level, the broader best AI for students guide; and for specific tasks, best AI for essays, best AI for research and best AI for coding.