Best AI for Writing in 2025: The Complete Guide
Compare 60+ AI writing tools including ChatGPT, Claude, Jasper, and more. Benchmarks, pricing, and recommendations for every writer type.
Last updated: December 2025
Quick answer: For prose quality and long-form writing, Claude produces the most natural, human-like output—Reddit consistently ranks it best for creative writing. For marketing copywriting at scale, Jasper dominates with brand voice training and team workflows. For fiction writers, Sudowrite is purpose-built with story bibles and character tracking. For general versatility, ChatGPT remains the market leader with 76% enterprise adoption.
The real answer depends on what you’re writing. This guide covers 60+ AI writing tools, from base models to specialised platforms, with quality comparisons, pricing, and real user feedback from r/writing and professional writer communities.
The current state of AI writing: December 2025
AI writing tools have matured into a $7.9 billion market. The adoption numbers tell the story: 80% of bloggers and 90% of content marketers now use AI writing tools, while enterprise adoption has reached 83% among large companies according to McKinsey’s State of AI 2025 report.
But the industry faces real pressure. Users increasingly complain about “robotic” output, 63% of marketers report finding inaccuracies in AI content, and AI-generated content receives 43% lower trust ratings from readers with 41% fewer social shares. The winners are creators adopting hybrid AI-human workflows that show +31% organic traffic and +24% rankings versus pure AI or pure human content.
Three major shifts define the current landscape:
-
Claude winning the prose quality war: Writers consistently praise Anthropic’s Claude for producing more natural, “legible prose” with better dialogue, humour, and character voice maintenance across long narratives.
-
Free tiers threatening specialised tools: With ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini all offering capable free tiers, dedicated writing platforms like Jasper and Copy.ai face increasing pressure to justify their premium pricing.
-
AI detection reshaping professional use: 67% of academic institutions plan to mandate AI detection tools according to Turnitin’s 2025 report, making the “write with AI, edit as human” workflow essential for anyone in education, journalism, or regulated industries.
Top AI models for writing (December 2025)
Unlike coding where SWE-bench provides clear rankings, writing quality is inherently subjective. However, based on user feedback from r/writing, r/selfpublish, professional writer surveys, and our testing, here’s how the base models compare for writing tasks:
| Rank | Model | Provider | Prose Quality | Context Window | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | ★★★★★ | 200K | Literary fiction, nuanced dialogue |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | ★★★★★ | 200K | Long-form content, character voice |
| 3 | GPT-5.1 | OpenAI | ★★★★☆ | 400K | Versatility, professional content |
| 4 | Gemini 3 Pro | ★★★★☆ | 1M | Research-heavy writing, fact synthesis | |
| 5 | GPT-5 | OpenAI | ★★★★☆ | 400K | Technical documentation |
| 6 | GPT-4o | OpenAI | ★★★☆☆ | 128K | Quick drafting, free tier value |
What these rankings actually mean
Claude’s writing advantage is real but specific. Reddit users consistently report Claude “nails conversation style” and produces writing that requires less editing to sound human. The 200K token context window (approximately 150,000 words) means Claude can maintain character consistency across an entire novel—a capability no competitor matches well.
ChatGPT remains more versatile. For structured professional content, technical writing, and tasks requiring specific formats, GPT-5.1 often outperforms. The gap between Claude and ChatGPT narrows significantly for business writing versus creative work.
Critical context: All models produce output that skilled readers can often identify as AI-generated. The goal isn’t “undetectable AI writing”—it’s AI that produces useful first drafts requiring minimal human editing.
Base AI models: choosing your foundation
1. Claude — Best prose quality
Price: Free tier, $20/month (Pro), $100-200/month (Max)
Context: 200K tokens (1M preview available)
Best for: Long-form creative writing, literary fiction, memoir, dialogue
Claude has become the top choice for writers who care about prose quality. The December 2025 lineup includes Opus 4.5 (most powerful), Sonnet 4.5 (best balance), and Haiku 4.5 (fastest, cheapest).
Why it wins: Writers on r/writing consistently praise Claude for maintaining character voice across hundreds of pages, producing more natural dialogue, and requiring less editing to remove “AI-isms.” The extended context window means you can paste an entire manuscript for editing without losing context.
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | ~10-15 messages/day, basic access |
| Pro | $20/month | Extended thinking, Research feature, Google Workspace integration |
| Max | $100-200/month | 5x-20x Pro usage, memory across conversations |
| Team | $25-30/user/month | Admin controls, enterprise features |
Limitations: Rate limits on free tier are frustrating for heavy users. Some find Claude “too agreeable” and prefer ChatGPT’s more direct responses. Less strong than ChatGPT for highly structured output formats.
Best for: Fiction writers, memoirists, anyone prioritising prose quality over raw speed.
2. ChatGPT — Best all-rounder
Price: Free tier, $20/month (Plus), $200/month (Pro)
Context: 400K tokens
Best for: General versatility, professional content, technical documentation
ChatGPT remains the market leader with 76% of AI-enabled businesses using it. The December 2025 version features GPT-5.1 with adaptive reasoning and new writing-specific features.
Why it wins: Unmatched versatility. ChatGPT excels at structured professional content—reports, documentation, business writing—where Claude’s literary strengths matter less. New features include Canvas for interactive document editing and customisable tone presets (Friendly, Efficient, Professional, Candid, Quirky).
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | GPT-4o mini, limited GPT-4o (~10 messages/3 hours) |
| Plus | $20/month | Unlimited GPT-4o, 3,000 GPT-5 messages/week |
| Pro | $200/month | Near-unlimited GPT-5, 120 deep research queries/month |
| Team | $25-30/user/month | Shared workspace, admin controls |
Limitations: Free tier is significantly more restricted than a year ago. Some writers find GPT output “corporate-sounding” without careful prompting.
Best for: Professional writers, technical documentation, anyone needing reliable general-purpose writing assistance.
3. Gemini — Best Google integration
Price: Free tier, $19.99/month (AI Pro), $249.99/month (AI Ultra)
Context: 1M tokens
Best for: Research-heavy writing, writers in the Google ecosystem
Gemini offers the largest context window at 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words) and native integration with Google Docs, Gmail, and Sheets. The November 2025 release of Gemini 3 Pro achieved world’s highest reasoning scores.
Why it wins: If you live in Google Workspace, Gemini’s native integration eliminates copy-paste friction. Deep Search runs hundreds of queries for comprehensive research before writing. The massive context window handles research synthesis better than competitors.
Limitations: Prose quality trails Claude for creative work. The $249.99/month Ultra tier feels overpriced compared to alternatives.
Best for: Researchers, journalists, anyone heavily invested in Google’s ecosystem.
4. Perplexity — Best for research-based writing
Price: Free tier, $20/month (Pro)
Best for: Fact-checking, finding citations, research synthesis
Perplexity has carved a unique niche with 780 million searches/month and 95% citation accuracy versus ChatGPT’s 88% according to independent testing. Every claim includes inline clickable sources.
Why it wins: For writers who need verified facts, statistics, and citations, Perplexity eliminates the hallucination problem that plagues other models. Deep Research generates comprehensive reports with full sourcing.
Limitations: Not designed for creative writing. The writing quality itself is functional but not polished.
Best for: Journalists, academic writers, anyone prioritising factual accuracy over prose style.
Marketing and copywriting tools
1. Jasper AI — Enterprise marketing leader
Price: $49/month (Creator), $69/month (Pro), custom enterprise
Best for: Marketing teams at scale, brand consistency
Jasper commands an estimated 20-30% market share in dedicated AI writing tools with a $1.5 billion valuation. Over 15 million users have created content on the platform.
Why it wins: Brand Voice training maintains consistency across team output—critical for enterprise marketing. 50+ templates cover every marketing format, from ad copy to landing pages. Recent 2025 updates introduced “Agentic AI Agents” for campaign planning and SEO automation.
User feedback: G2 reviews note “pricing seems way too much” compared to free ChatGPT/Gemini alternatives. However, Jasper maintains 85% retention rate and 4.8/5 satisfaction scores among paying customers who value brand governance and team collaboration.
| Plan | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Creator | $49/month | 1 seat, brand voice, SEO mode |
| Pro | $69/month | 3 seats, browser extension, Jasper Art |
| Business | Custom ($5,000-70,000+/year) | Unlimited seats, API, enterprise security |
Limitations: Overkill for individual writers. The value proposition weakens as base models improve.
Best for: Marketing teams needing brand consistency at scale, not solo creators.
2. Copy.ai — Best mid-market value
Price: Free (2,000 words/month), $49/month (Pro)
Best for: Quick marketing copy, template-based content
Copy.ai has positioned itself as a “GTM AI Platform” with 15+ million users. The free tier offers genuine utility at 2,000 words/month—enough to test the product seriously.
Why it wins: 90+ content templates cover most marketing needs. Accessible pricing and a useful free tier make it ideal for small businesses and freelancers.
Limitations: Output requires manual refinement—described as “ideal for quick-hit marketing copy and brainstorming” rather than polished final drafts.
Best for: Small businesses, freelancers, anyone wanting marketing templates without enterprise pricing.
3. Writesonic — Best for SEO focus
Price: Free tier, $20-499/month
Best for: SEO content, AI-powered search tracking
Writesonic serves 10+ million marketers and has pivoted toward SEO with Chatsonic (real-time web search) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) for tracking AI citations in search results.
Why it wins: Native WordPress integration, real-time web search for current facts, and AI visibility tracking as search evolves beyond traditional results.
Limitations: 2025 pricing restructuring drew criticism for being “pretty pricey compared to earlier.” Core writing quality trails dedicated prose tools.
Best for: SEO-focused content marketers, WordPress publishers.
4. Rytr — Best budget option
Price: Free tier, $9/month (Saver), $29/month (Unlimited)
Best for: Budget-conscious writers, basic short-form content
Rytr remains the most affordable dedicated AI writer on the market. The $9/month Saver plan offers 50,000 characters—sufficient for most individual users.
Why it wins: At $9/month, you get 80% of the functionality of $49/month tools for basic marketing copy. Includes 40+ use cases, tone options, and plagiarism checking.
Limitations: Uses GPT-3-based technology (older than competitors). Output quality trails premium options and requires more editing.
Best for: Freelancers and small businesses with limited budgets.
Creative writing tools
1. Sudowrite — Best for fiction writers
Price: $10/month (Hobby), $25/month (Pro), $59/month (Max)
Best for: Novelists, fiction writers, worldbuilding
Sudowrite earns consistent praise as “probably the most impressive tool on the market” for fiction writers. It’s purpose-built for narrative rather than adapted from general-purpose AI.
Why it wins: The platform offers its own proprietary Muse model designed to avoid clichés, plus access to Claude, GPT-4, and Deepseek. Key features include Story Bible for centralised character/worldbuilding management, Canvas for visual story structure, and Chapter Continuity linking for consistency across long works.
| Feature | What it does |
|---|---|
| Describe | Enhance sensory details |
| Expand | Build out scenes |
| Brainstorm | Generate plot directions |
| Rewrite | Rework passages in different styles |
| Story Bible | Track characters, settings, plot points |
Limitations: Learning curve for the interface. The value depends heavily on fiction-specific features—general writers may prefer base models directly.
Best for: Novelists, genre fiction writers, anyone serious about long-form creative writing.
2. NovelAI — Best for creative freedom
Price: $10-25/month
Best for: Roleplay, fan fiction, mature content, maximum flexibility
NovelAI targets a different creative segment with its Lorebook world-building system, anime-style image generation, and less restrictive content filters (allows NSFW and darker content that mainstream tools censor).
Why it wins: The Kayra AI Storyteller model supports style mimicry to write in the voice of famous authors. Maximum creative freedom without content restrictions.
Limitations: Requires more prompt engineering skill than Sudowrite. Less polished interface. Niche appeal limits community resources.
Best for: Roleplay enthusiasts, fan fiction writers, visual novel creators, writers who prioritise creative freedom over polish.
3. Squibler — AI-powered manuscript management
Price: $16/month
Best for: Writers wanting integrated project management
Squibler combines AI writing assistance with manuscript organisation—goal tracking, version history, and export tools. Think Scrivener with AI built in.
Why it wins: All-in-one solution for writers who want project management alongside AI assistance. Goal tracking and progress visualisation help maintain writing momentum.
Limitations: Less powerful AI than dedicated tools. The integrated approach means compromise on both manuscript management and AI quality.
Best for: Writers wanting a single tool for both organisation and AI assistance.
Grammar and editing tools
1. Grammarly — Industry standard
Price: Free tier, $12/month (Pro), $15/user/month (Business)
Best for: Daily grammar checking, professional polish
Grammarly has evolved from grammar checker to full generative AI platform with GrammarlyGO capabilities. Ranked #1 most trusted AI tool by G2 in 2025 with 65% of professional writers using it.
Why it wins: Ubiquitous integration—Google Docs, Gmail, MS Word, LinkedIn, Slack, and most browsers. The free tier provides excellent daily grammar checking. Premium adds 2,000 AI prompts/month for instant draft generation, rewriting, and tone adjustment.
| Plan | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Basic grammar, spelling, punctuation |
| Pro | $12/month (annual) | Style suggestions, tone detection, GrammarlyGO |
| Business | $15/user/month | Team features, style guides, admin |
Limitations: English-only. For multilingual needs, LanguageTool ($4.99/month) offers 30+ languages at a lower price.
Best for: Everyone. The free tier alone makes it worth installing.
2. ProWritingAid — Best for long-form analysis
Price: $10-12/month, or $399 lifetime
Best for: Authors, novelists, deep style analysis
ProWritingAid provides 25+ writing analysis reports including style, readability, pacing, sticky sentences, dialogue tags, and author comparison (match style to 90 fiction authors). The lifetime purchase option offers exceptional value for committed writers.
Why it wins: Unmatched depth of style analysis. Reports on pacing, dialogue, overused words, and sentence structure give novelists actionable feedback that grammar tools miss. Scrivener integration is a major plus for fiction writers.
Limitations: Lacks mobile app. Can be slow on large documents. The depth can feel overwhelming for quick checks.
Best for: Authors, novelists, and academic writers who want deep style analysis beyond grammar.
3. QuillBot — Best paraphrasing tool
Price: Free tier, $19.95/month, or $99.95/year
Best for: Paraphrasing, academic writing, rephrasing existing content
QuillBot dominates the paraphrasing niche with 7 modes (Standard, Fluency, Formal, Academic, Creative, Expand, Shorten). The Synonym Slider controls rephrasing degree while Freeze Words protects specific terms.
Why it wins: Purpose-built for the specific task of rewriting existing content. Academic features include citation generator (MLA, APA, Chicago), plagiarism checker (20 pages/month Premium), and AI detector. Student pricing available at $74.95/year (25% discount).
Limitations: Free tier limited to 125 words. Less useful for generating new content versus reworking existing text.
Best for: Students, academics, anyone needing to paraphrase or rework existing content.
SEO writing tools
1. Surfer SEO — Industry standard for optimisation
Price: $79-219/month
Best for: SEO-optimised content, data-driven writing
Surfer SEO leads the SEO content optimisation market with its Content Score metric showing 0.28 correlation with Google rankings according to Surfer’s published research.
Why it wins: Real-time optimisation scoring, SERP analysis of 500+ ranking signals, and AI Visibility tracking for monitoring presence in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews. Integrates with Google Docs, WordPress, Jasper, and Writesonic.
| Plan | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Essential | $79/month | 30 Content Editor articles/month |
| Scale | $129/month | 70 articles, Audit |
| Enterprise | $219/month | Unlimited, API, Priority support |
Limitations: Learning curve for the data-heavy interface. Primarily optimises existing writing rather than generating from scratch.
Best for: SEO professionals, content marketers optimising for search rankings.
2. NeuronWriter — Best budget SEO option
Price: €19-117/month (~$23-140)
Best for: Budget-conscious SEO writers
NeuronWriter offers similar NLP-based content editing at significantly lower cost than Surfer. Features include semantic term suggestions with colour-coding, internal linking recommendations, and plagiarism checking on Gold+ plans.
Why it wins: Often described as “excellent SEO value” by budget-conscious marketers. Core functionality matches Surfer at roughly half the price.
Limitations: Smaller user community. Less brand recognition may matter for agency work.
Best for: Freelancers and small teams wanting SEO tools without Surfer’s pricing.
3. Frase — Best for AI search optimisation
Price: $14.99-114.99/month
Best for: Optimising for AI search results (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude)
Frase uniquely focuses on GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)—optimising for visibility in AI assistants, not just Google. As search evolves toward AI-generated answers, this forward-looking focus may prove prescient.
Why it wins: AI article writing in ~10 minutes, brand voice training, content brief generation, and tracking visibility across AI platforms. Best entry price at $14.99/month (Solo plan).
Limitations: Smaller market position than Surfer. The GEO focus is speculative—traditional SEO still dominates traffic.
Best for: Forward-thinking content marketers preparing for AI-first search.
Enterprise writing tools
1. Writer.com — Best for brand governance
Price: $18-39/user/month
Best for: Large enterprises, regulated industries, brand compliance
Writer.com targets enterprises with style guide enforcement that maintains brand consistency across teams. Notable clients include Accenture, Marriott, Uber, and Vanguard.
Why it wins: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and PCI-DSS compliance for regulated industries. Knowledge Graph connects AI to internal business data. Proprietary Palmyra LLMs trained specifically on business writing.
Limitations: Enterprise-focused pricing excludes individual writers. Overkill for teams not needing compliance features.
Best for: Healthcare, finance, and regulated industries prioritising brand governance over individual creativity.
Best AI writing tools by use case
| Use Case | Top Pick | Budget Pick | Price Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| General writing | Claude Pro | ChatGPT Free | $0-20/month |
| Marketing copy | Jasper AI | Rytr | $9-69/month |
| Long-form blog content | Surfer SEO + Claude | Frase | $14.99-219/month |
| Fiction/creative writing | Sudowrite | NovelAI | $10-59/month |
| Academic writing | QuillBot + Claude | QuillBot Free | $0-20/month |
| Business/professional | Writer.com | Grammarly Pro | $12-39/user/month |
| Email writing | ChatGPT | Copy.ai Free | $0-49/month |
| SEO content | Surfer SEO | NeuronWriter | $23-219/month |
| Grammar/editing | Grammarly | Grammarly Free | $0-12/month |
| Research-based writing | Perplexity Pro | Perplexity Free | $0-20/month |
Free tiers worth using
ChatGPT Free offers the best free value with GPT-4o access (limited). Enough for light daily use.
Claude Free provides approximately 10-15 messages/day with high-quality output. Best prose quality in a free tier.
Grammarly Free delivers excellent daily grammar checking with no word limits. Install it regardless of other tools you use.
Copy.ai Free provides 2,000 words/month for testing templates. Useful for occasional marketing copy.
QuillBot Free handles light paraphrasing despite the 125-word limit. Worth bookmarking for quick rewrites.
Gemini Free offers strong capabilities with Google integration. Competitive with ChatGPT’s free tier.
What real users say (Reddit consensus)
Reddit discussions on r/writing and r/selfpublish reveal pragmatic sentiment. The communities show a 60/40 split—60% support AI-assisted writing, 40% fear it reduces creativity.
The consensus: “The key question isn’t ‘Did AI write this?’ but ‘Did the writer put in the work to shape it with intention?’”
Common workflow patterns among successful users:
- AI for brainstorming/outlining → human selection
- AI “rough outs” dialogue → human rewrites
- AI simplifies overwritten passages → human polishes
- AI accelerates research → human synthesises
Persistent complaints: Output sounds “robotic” without heavy editing, detection concerns for academic/professional use, lack of emotional depth, factual hallucinations requiring verification. As one user summarised: “You can’t just let the AI rip and hope for the best.”
Frequently asked questions
Which AI writes the most “human” content?
Claude consistently ranks highest for prose that requires minimal editing to sound human. The gap is most noticeable in creative writing—for business content, ChatGPT and Claude produce similar results.
However, no AI passes as human to skilled readers. The goal is reducing editing time, not creating undetectable content.
Is AI-generated content bad for SEO?
Google’s official guidance states they evaluate content quality regardless of how it’s produced—AI content isn’t automatically penalised. However, thin AI content without human value-add performs poorly.
What works: Hybrid AI-human workflows showing +31% organic traffic versus pure AI or pure human content. Use AI for first drafts; add human expertise, analysis, and original insights.
Can AI replace professional writers?
Short answer: No, but it changes what writers do.
The data: 27% decline in entry-level writing jobs, but 97 million new AI-adjacent roles expected according to World Economic Forum research. Writers who learn AI tools command premium rates; those who refuse face increasing competition.
Reality: AI handles commodity content. Human writers focus on strategy, original reporting, complex analysis, and the editorial judgment AI lacks.
How do I avoid AI detection?
The ethical answer: Don’t try to pass AI content as human where that matters (academia, journalism, certain professional contexts).
The practical answer: Heavy human editing naturally removes AI-isms. Tools like GPTZero claim 99% accuracy but produce false positives on human-written content. Focus on adding genuine human insight rather than gaming detectors.
What’s the best free AI writing tool?
For general use: ChatGPT Free or Claude Free—both offer capable models with meaningful daily limits.
For grammar: Grammarly Free—no word limits, works everywhere.
For research: Perplexity Free—verified citations beat ChatGPT for factual content.
For marketing: Copy.ai Free—2,000 words/month is enough to test the approach.
Should I pay for Jasper if I have ChatGPT?
Probably not unless you need brand voice training across a team.
Jasper’s value proposition is team workflow, brand consistency, and enterprise features. Individual writers get better value from ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) or Claude Pro ($20/month). The gap has narrowed significantly as base models improved.
What about AI detection in academia?
67% of academic institutions plan to mandate AI detection tools. The safest approach: use AI for research and outlining, write original prose yourself, cite AI assistance when appropriate.
Many universities now have explicit AI use policies—check yours before submitting work.
Which tool is best for blog posts versus novels?
Blog posts: ChatGPT or Claude for drafting, Surfer SEO for optimisation, Grammarly for polish. Total: $20-99/month.
Novels: Sudowrite for fiction-specific features, Claude for prose quality, ProWritingAid for deep editing. Total: $30-80/month.
The workflows differ more than the tools. Blog posts benefit from SEO optimisation; novels need character tracking and continuity features.
The future: What’s coming in 2025-2026
AI detection arms race continues
Tools like GPTZero and Turnitin improve detection, while models evolve to produce less detectable output. This creates an unproductive arms race. The solution is cultural—clearer norms about when AI assistance is appropriate rather than hiding it.
Voice and multimodal writing
ChatGPT and Claude now support voice interaction. Expect writing tools to add voice dictation with AI cleanup, screen capture with automatic documentation, and video-to-text workflows. The keyboard becomes optional for first drafts.
Specialisation accelerates
As base models commoditise, winners will be vertical-specific tools: legal writing AI, medical documentation AI, technical writing AI. Generic “AI writing tools” face pressure from free base model tiers.
The hybrid workflow becomes standard
Early adopter workflows—AI for drafts, humans for expertise and judgment—will become industry standard. Writers who refuse AI tools will be like designers who refused Photoshop in 2005: increasingly niche.
Conclusion: How to choose in December 2025
The AI writing landscape has matured into clear tiers. Claude leads prose quality for creative and long-form writing. ChatGPT leads versatility for general-purpose work. Specialised tools (Jasper for marketing, Sudowrite for fiction, Surfer for SEO) justify their premiums only when you need specific features.
For tool selection:
- Creative writing: Claude Pro ($20/month) or Sudowrite ($25/month) for fiction-specific features
- Professional writing: ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) or Claude Pro—either delivers strong value
- Marketing teams: Jasper ($49-69/month) for brand voice and team workflows
- SEO content: Surfer SEO ($79/month) + base model of choice
- Budget writers: ChatGPT Free + Grammarly Free handles most needs
- Academic writers: Claude + QuillBot for paraphrasing and citations
- Enterprise: Writer.com for compliance and brand governance
The productivity reality: Hybrid AI-human workflows outperform pure approaches. Use AI for first drafts, research, and brainstorming. Add human expertise, original analysis, and editorial judgment. The best content in 2025 combines AI efficiency with human insight.
Trust but verify: 63% of marketers report AI inaccuracies. Always fact-check statistics, verify quotes, and review output before publishing. AI writes faster than it thinks.
The tools work. Prose quality has genuinely improved. But they’re writing assistants, not writing replacements—and that’s unlikely to change soon.